In addition to the Reserved Matters Applications, a number of other issues were discussed at last week’s Stakeholders meeting.
Persimmon notified us that they had not entered into an agreement yet with the Goodman Charity regarding the land on the High Street. No time scale was
indicated but, considering Persimmon hopes to re-commence works within the next few weeks, it seems unlikely that the promised site access route via this land will be in use. Once again the poor residents of Lodge Road will have to put up with all the site traffic passing their homes. Persimmon does not have any legal obligations to access their site via the High Street (in fact they are required to access via Lodge Road) but it was agreed by them last year as a
gesture of goodwill. We can only hope that they do enter into some sort of agreement with the Goodman Charity quickly, even if it is only for access to Home Farm at this stage.
A representative of Dennison, Stephen Smith, was also present at this meeting. As a rather large player in the overall development of the scheme (they not only own some of the land, they are building houses too) it was good to have him present. Both Persimmon and Dennison confirmed that there was STILL no dialogue between them and again, there was no indication from Persimmon when any dialogue or agreement would be reached. Whilst we understand that neither party wishes to openly discuss commercial negotiations, their agreement has a major bearing on what Cranfield residents will gain from the development, other than 371 new houses.
One of the main sticking points for the whole site is the proposed path from Home Farm to the centre of the village. The 106 agreement is very clear on this:
“Not to permit the occupation of any Residential
Unit without first entering into the Section 38 Agreement with the County
Council.”
Although we thought that because the path runs across Dennison’s land and without any agreement in place they cannot build the path, it seems that as long as they submit a S38 and the Council approves it, they can start occupying houses. Not quite what we were all led to believe.
Persimmon has again reiterated that Cranfield will get everything agreed within the 106 and of course, the above example is only one of many 106
triggers, but I tend to think that once houses start going up, like a train at high-speed, it takes a lot of force to stop it again. Maybe Persimmon could restore a little faith in the village by using the High Street as their main access point, as they once agreed? Let’s wait and see.
The Highways works in Lodge Road were also discussed at length. A number of surveys have been carried out since the roundabout was completed and although it was built to original plans; it seems that Highways agree it is incorrect and remedial action is required. At the moment, it has been suggested that the easiest and cheapest action would be to move the give way lines in Lodge Road forward to allow a clear line of sight and move the white spot over also. This would mean that further major work relocating the kerb lines would not be required.
The matter was raised regarding the re-design of the entrance into Home Farm from Lodge Road. Although Highways were not present, the Council Planning Officer did advise us that the S278 Officer had the flexibility to apply minor changes to the plans as he saw fit to ensure the works can be carried out in a practical fashion. Apparently, the reason the kerbs were moved and a chicane placed in the road was to allow farm traffic access. I have asked the Planning Officer to raise the issue with Highways as a matter of urgency as this has completely changed the access and they have in effect, created a T Junction allowing traffic to enter and leave the site from either end of Lodge Road, contrary to all the agreements and safe guards put in place, including the quiet lane status.